Laden im
Google Play
Herausbildung moderner strukturen in gesellschaft und staat
Bipolare welt und deutschland nach 1953
Die moderne industriegesellschaft zwischen fortschritt und krise
Das 20. jahrhundert
Deutschland zwischen demokratie und diktatur
Friedensschlüsse und ordnungen des friedens in der moderne
Der mensch und seine geschichte
Das geteilte deutschland und die wiedervereinigung
Imperialismus und erster weltkrieg
Europa und globalisierung
Die zeit des nationalsozialismus
Frühe neuzeit
Europa und die welt
Großreiche
Demokratie und freiheit
Alle Themen
Mensch-umwelt-beziehungen
Ressourcenkonflikte und ressourcenmanagement
China
Klimawandel und klimaschutz
Klima und vegetationszonen
Herausforderungen an die menschen des 21. jahrhunderts
Australien und ozeanien
Russland
Europa
Entwicklung in tropischen räumen
Die subpolare und polare zone
Planet erde
Entwicklungsperspektiven
Globalisierung
Usa
Alle Themen
25.10.2021
4075
187
Teilen
Speichern
Herunterladen
the monarohy - still has a monarchy, but at the same time it is the oldest democracy in the world - has never written a constitution in its history - political system is based on a number of documents that are linked to important a number of important events in British history The Magna Carta (Great Charter) 1215 - earls and barons in the Middle Ages were often dissatisfied with the way their kinds governed the country → rebelled against decisions - in 1215 they made King Johan sign a document that limited the king's power and protected their own privileges The Bill of Rights 1689 - another constitutional document that limited the powers of the crown while reinforcing the rights of the parliament later developments - women were still not allowed to vote at the beginning of the 20th century There are two houses: the House of Commons and the House of Lords The House of Commons - 650 members are directly elected by voters in the constituentcies - the actual legislative body of the UK The House of Lords - main function: to examine and revise the work of the government thereby sharing the task of shaping laws and checking the governments legislation - to discuss, examine or delay bills general elections - they are generally held ever five years BRITAIN The fact of being British, or qualities that are considered...
iOS User
Philipp, iOS User
Lena, iOS Userin
typical of British people represents the British spirit→→Lifestyle SHOULD THEY ABOLISH THE BRITISH MONARCHY? YES, THEY SHOULD - the royal family is cost-intensive (representation of the family is expensive); but: they have gained a lot of money through all thousands millions tourists British taxpayers loose a certain amount of money in Britain's monarchy; but: an alternative elected head of state would not be cost-free either having a queen as head of state who has inherited her title would be incompatible with democracy → Britain might be one of the countries in Europe that still has a monarchy but at the same time it's the oldest democracy in the world → the queen has only very limited powers and mostly representational functions → she embodies British stereotypes and helps symbolizing Britishness and national values - no separation between state and religion, tied to the church - arrogant and snobby family The Queen - has no overt power but is formally part of the government system she is... ... head of state ... a symbol of national unity important function - appoints the Prime Minister > by inviting the leader of the majority in the House of Commons to form a government - represents the country at home and abroad NO, THEY SHOULDN'T Britain is known for its royal family - change is difficult to manage -68% of British inhabitants think that the institution of the monarchy os good for Britain - Why should we abolish something that is accepted and loved by most of the Britains? - makes Britain different from most other countries - good for charity/ the royal family does a lot of charitiy - British monarchy attracts tourists which is an economic factor and part of the entertainment industry Queen is a well-respected person would ruin the nation' tradition/loss of traditions - monarchy costs only a few cents for each taxpayer - keeps the people interested in history