Alternativer Bildtext:

donor). also beneficial in terms of ethics as a sick patient people suffer from the thought of hoping for someone's death in order to live themselves. • unless forced people are reluctant to register in donation Lists (-porgan shortage) . • often the only chance of survival for people with a genetic disorder it's no new human, because you use your own cells for the organethically OK . • cloning individuality Deverybody should stay individual, it is a value and givenh right, by God and by democratic constitutions which cloning. Can identical copy of the genelic material) infringes upon" Christian bioethicist interfering with evolution/ the creation and DNA is playing God! - the door is open to people chasing the qualities for your unborn baby • in the end, who will be responsible for the decisions and ultimately the choice of who is to live and who is to die? when you can live forever (because you piere by piece replace everything in your body as soon as it ages) i makes life worthless while saving lives is good, endlessly lengthening them is not C from an ethical point of view →clones or genetically modified children could be discriminated against . critical scientist fear of mutation is omnipresent • cloned material (eg tissues, organs enzymes, cauld cause cancer and really often doess -> the chance of getting cancer is still quite . if your transplanted organ is a genetically engineered one which has not been cloned from your own cells, immune rejections are possible ( where will it all end? Will be eventually be able to create the superhuman? Will the dystopian vision of superpower Soldiers become reality?