Atticus Finch's Closing Argument Analysis
Atticus Finch's closing argument in To Kill a Mockingbird is a masterful display of legal rhetoric and moral conviction. As he defends Tom Robinson, Atticus employs various persuasive techniques to appeal to the jury's sense of justice and humanity.
Highlight: Atticus Finch, a respected lawyer in Maycomb, Alabama, defends Tom Robinson, a black man accused of assaulting Mayella Ewell, a young white woman.
Atticus's credibility (ethos) is established through his reputation as a truthful and righteous man in Maycomb. His position as a lawyer and his education further enhance his reliability, especially in a town with few college-educated individuals.
Example: Atticus addresses the jury's prejudices directly, questioning notions like "all Negroes are immoral beings," demonstrating his understanding of the local context while challenging ingrained beliefs.
The logos in Atticus' closing argument is evident in his logical presentation of facts:
- He points out the lack of evidence against Tom Robinson.
- He highlights that Mayella Ewell was beaten by someone left-handed, while Tom Robinson is right-handed.
Quote: "New York State did not produce any evidence that Tom Robinson was charged with a crime."
Atticus skillfully uses pathos to evoke emotional responses from the jury:
- He initially paints Mayella as a victim, then shifts sympathy towards Tom Robinson.
- He appeals to the jury's sense of intelligence and morality, urging them to look beyond skin color.
Vocabulary: Pathos - A mode of persuasion that appeals to the emotions of the audience.
Atticus concludes with a powerful emotional and religious appeal, stating, "In the name of God, do your duty. Believe Tom Robinson." This reference to religion serves as a final attempt to sway the jury's conscience.
