Fächer

Fächer

Mehr

Malcolm X „The Ballot or the Bullet“ Analyse

31.5.2021

3974

188

Teilen

Speichern

Herunterladen


Analysis of "The Ballot or the Bullet" by Malcolm X
The public speech "The Ballot Or the Bullet" was delivered by the human rights activist
Analysis of "The Ballot or the Bullet" by Malcolm X
The public speech "The Ballot Or the Bullet" was delivered by the human rights activist

Analysis of "The Ballot or the Bullet" by Malcolm X The public speech "The Ballot Or the Bullet" was delivered by the human rights activist Malcolm X on April 3 1964 at Cory Methodist Church in Cleveland and broaches the issue of discrimination against black people in America and vocalises an appeal for black people to use their voices, stand up for their rights and vote. He starts his speech by addressing the entirety of the African American community and saying that they should put aside their differences to support each other in regards to the problem they all have in common: discrimination by white people. He clarifies that speaking up about the oppression of black people by white people does not mean that black people are against white people, but against the actions that hurt black people, before saying that it is time for the black community to act against the oppression they have to endure. Malcom X brings up his problem with identifying as an American as an argument for black people to stand up for themselves, as he mentions that black people could not be American as long as they face problems within the American system and notes the contrast between the black people in America and the people who immigrated...

Nichts passendes dabei? Erkunde andere Fachbereiche.

Knowunity ist die #1 unter den Bildungs-Apps in fünf europäischen Ländern

Knowunity ist die #1 unter den Bildungs-Apps in fünf europäischen Ländern

Knowunity wurde bei Apple als "Featured Story" ausgezeichnet und hat die App-Store-Charts in der Kategorie Bildung in Deutschland, Italien, Polen, der Schweiz und dem Vereinigten Königreich regelmäßig angeführt. Werde noch heute Mitglied bei Knowunity und hilf Millionen von Schüler:innen auf der ganzen Welt.

Ranked #1 Education App

Laden im

Google Play

Laden im

App Store

Immer noch nicht überzeugt? Schau dir an, was andere Schüler:innen sagen...

iOS User

Ich liebe diese App so sehr, ich benutze sie auch täglich. Ich empfehle Knowunity jedem!! Ich bin damit von einer 4 auf eine 1 gekommen :D

Philipp, iOS User

Die App ist sehr einfach und gut gestaltet. Bis jetzt habe ich immer alles gefunden, was ich gesucht habe :D

Lena, iOS Userin

Ich liebe diese App ❤️, ich benutze sie eigentlich immer, wenn ich lerne.

Alternativer Bildtext:

there from Europe. He furthermore says that being born in America is not equivalent to being an American, because if it were equivalent, black people would not need the civil-rights movement to be treated as citizens. He states that he does not see the American dream, but rather the American nightmare, in light of the fact that he views the country through the eyes of a victim of the American system. After vocalising the issue, he demands that black people should use their voices in 1964 and use their possibility to vote, as the other option is violence. Malcolm then gives voice to the new approach of the young black people to gain rights in America, which is a violent strategy, the only other option he deems as possible to make a change other than voting. In regard to violence, he claims that there should be no violence as long as the black community is not treated violently, but that the violence of white people against black people should also be reciprocated with such a force. He ends his speech by calling Uncle Sam, the personification of America and it's government, a hypocrite and saying he has black people's blood on his hands. He also once again demands that African Americans should vote. The given speech has many rhetorical and linguistically interesting aspects. The title of the speech itself is rhetorically noticeable. "The ballot or the bullet" is an alliteration that he uses to emphasise the two options he sees regarding the civil-rights movement of African Americans, which are voting or violence. He begins his speech by addressing the black people who live in America. He does that by using the pronouns "we" or "us" (I. 1), words that can be seen throughout the entire speech. This creates a sense of alliance and union and gives the listener a corporate feeling. He also uses a metaphor in the beginning of the speech, as he describes the issue the black community faces as sitting in the same boat (1.3), creating once again a feeling of union and visualisation for the people listening. He wants black people in America to unite on one common ground and to forget about their in-differences. When mentioning the problems created by white people that black people suffer from, Malcom X uses a tricolon by repeating the same set of words three times: "...political oppression at the hands of the white man, economic exploitation at the hands of the white man, and social degradation at the hands of the white man" (I. 5 f.) He does that to emphasise how many problems white people created for black people. There is another use of a tricolon in his speech when he brings up the identification of black people with the American nationality and lists examples of European immigrants who were seen as American upon their arrival in America (I. 14 f.). This once again is used for emphasising. He wants to show how unequal black people in America are treated opposed to Caucasians. He uses another metaphor to illustrate the inequality of black and white people in America by comparing rights to food on a plate and saying that he cannot call himself a diner while he has nothing on his plate and can only watch other people eat. He says that only sitting at the table does not make one a diner, as there is nothing to dine (II. 18-20). The picture he painted with this metaphor is pretty clear: America is the table, the people with food on their plates who can dine are white people, and the person with no food represents the black community, meaning that only the people with rights in America can call themselves American. To describe his thoughts on America as a country as a black man, he contrasts the well known term "American dream" with the words "American nightmare", as he perceives life in America as such (I. 27). By doing this he emphasises how much the American system negatively impacts black people, as the American dream is seen as such a big part of the American nationality and identity and desirable, but not even achievable for black people because their lives are the exact opposite of what the American dream is. When speaking about the new strategies of the young black people, he enumerates what happens if black people do not vote and uses a parallel structure: "It'll be Molotov cocktails this month, hand grenades next month, and something else next month. It'll be ballots, or it'll be bullets. It'll be liberty, or it'll be death" (I. 34 f.). The realised result of this parallelism and enumeration is to highlight how violent the civil-rights movement can get if people do not act and vote now. The reciprocating violence that was shown to black people for years and results out of that is justified by Malcom X with the saying "what's good for the goose is good for the gander", which means that one person should get treated the same way another person is treated (l. 41 f.). To illustrate the number of black people that were and still are oppressed and exploited for the thrive of white people in America, he uses the metaphor of Uncle Sam's hands dripping with blood (1.34), as many black people died for America as a nation. In conclusion, it can be said that Malcom X focuses on the issue of oppression in his speech and heavily appeals to black people to take action and vote to gain the rights they deserve, therefore elucidating the impression that the addressed audience of the given speech are black people and the intention is to educate them and to make it plain that they must use their power to vote to make changes in America, especially regarding the civil-rights movement, which was prominent during that time.